Visit our Newsroom
KEY STEPS
NEGOTIATIONS
FOCUS
PROCESS
|
|
Your location: Home |
|
Submissions by non-governmental organizations
|
Please note that NGO and IGO submission webpages are newly streamlined and
categorized by the negotiating body considering the submissions in order to enhance
Parties' accessibility to the information. Consequently, this page is no longer updated
but will remain available as an archive for submissions before 2013. The new webpage
that lists observer submissions from 2013 onwards can be found here.
|
|
For submissions by Parties, please follow this link.
|
|
2013
Research and systematic observation Update on
developments in research activities relevant to the needs of the Convention; and
information from Parties and regional and international research programmes and
organizations active in climate change research on the technical and scientific aspects of
emissions by sources, removals by sinks, and reservoirs of all greenhouse gases, including
emissions and removals from terrestrial ecosystems such as steppe, savannah, tundra and
peatlands, with a view to identifying and quantifying the impact of human activities, for
consideration as a theme for the next research dialogue (SBSTA 38)
For mandates see FCCC/SBSTA/2007/4,
paragraph 47(a-f) and FCCC/SBSTA/2012/5,
paragraph 52
General guidelines for domestic measurement, reporting and verification of
domestically supported nationally appropriate mitigation actions by developing country
Parties
Submissions from non-admitted organizations
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2012/l.24,
paragraph 3
Views on in-session workshop on the 2013-2015 Review
Invitation for submissions of views and reminder to select co-facilitators by a joint
message from the Chair of the SBSTA and the Chair of the SBI
Views on possible changes to the modalities and procedures of the clean development
mechanism
Submissions from non-admitted organizations
- Human Rights & Climate Change Working Group, Abibimman Foundation, Alianza para la
Conservación y el Desarrollo, Asociación Ambientalista de Chiriquí,
Carbon Market Watch, Centro de Estudios Ecológicos de la República Argentina,
Climate Concept Foundation, Colectivo Revuelta Verde, Friends of the Earth – England,
Wales, and Northern Ireland, Foundation for GAIA, Global Alliance for Incinerator
Alternatives, Gujarat Forum on CDM,
Himal Prakriti - A Trust for Nature, International-Lawyers.Org, Klima ohne Grenzen
gemeinnützige, La Mesa Nacional de Cambio Climático de Guatemala, Movimiento
Ciudadano frente al Cambio Climático, Public Interest Network, Participatory
Research & Action Network, Paryavaran Mitra, Planetary Association for Clean Energy,
Regional Centre for Development Cooperation, Society for Promotion of Wasteland (see
Asociación Interamericana para la Defensa del Ambiente, Center for International
Environmental Law, Earthjustice and International Rivers Network link above)
For mandate see Decision 5/CMP.8, paragraph 10
Views from Parties and admitted observer organizations on the matters referred to
in paragraphs 44–46 of document FCCC/CP/2012/L.14/Rev.1, including information,
experience and good practice relevant to the design and operation of various approaches
(Framework for various approaches)
Submissions from non-admitted organizations
- Asian Indigenous Women's Network, [earth], Friends of the Earth England, Wales and
Northern Ireland, Friends of the Earth Malaysia, Sustainable Energy and Economy Network
(SEEN) (see Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy, Institute for Policy Studies, Third
World Network and Tebtebba Foundation link above)
For mandate see Decision 1/CP.18, paragraph 48
Views from Parties and admitted observer organizations on the matters referred to
in paragraph 47 of document FCCC/CP/2012/L.14/Rev.1, including information, experience and
good practice relevant to the design and operation of various approaches (Non-market-based
approaches)
Submissions from non-admitted organizations
- Asian Indigenous Women's Network, [earth], Friends of the Earth England, Wales and
Northern Ireland, Friends of the Earth Malaysia, Sustainable Energy and Economy Network
(SEEN) (see Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy, Institute for Policy Studies, Third
World Network and Tebtebba Foundation link above)
- ICCA Consortium (see Global Forest Coalition and Econexus link above)
For mandate see Decision 1/CP.18, paragraph 48
Views from Parties and admitted observer organizations on the matters referred to
in paragraphs 50–51 of document FCCC/CP/2012/L.14/Rev.1, including information,
experience and good practice relevant to the design and operation of the mechanism referred
to in paragraph 50 (New market-based mechanism)
Submissions from non-admitted organizations
- Asian Indigenous Women's Network, [earth], Friends of the Earth England, Wales and
Northern Ireland, Friends of the Earth Malaysia, Sustainable Energy and Economy Network
(SEEN) (see Global Forest Coalition, Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy, Institute
for Policy Studies, Third World Network (TWN) and Tebtebba Foundation link above)
For mandate see Decision 1/CP.18, paragraph 52
Forum and work programme on the impact of the implementation of response measures -
submission on areas (c), (d), (e) and (g) of the work programme.
Submissions from non-admitted organizations
For mandate see
FCCC/SBSTA/2012/2, paragraph 46 and FCCC/SBI/2012/15,
paragraph 168
Work programme on clarification of quantified economy-wide emission reduction
targets of developed country Parties
Views by all Parties on the work programme referred to in paragraph 8 of
FCCC/CP/2012/L.14/Rev.1
Additional information by developed country Parties for the clarification of their targets
and associated assumptions and conditions as outlined in decision 2/CP.17, paragraph
5.
Invitation to developed country Parties to submit information on the progress made towards
the formulation of their low-emission development strategies.
For mandate see FCCC/CP/2012/L.14/Rev.1,
paragraphs 10 and 11
Views on issues related to modalities and procedures for alternative approaches to
addressing the risk of non-permanence under the clean development mechanism (CDM), in
accordance with decision 2/CMP.7, paragraph 7
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2012/5,
paragraph 111
Views on matters referred to in decision 1/CP.18, paragraphs 34 and 35: relating to
coordination of support for the implementation of REDD+ activities.
For mandate see Decision 1/CP.18, paragraph 36
Long-term finance (COP) - Views from Parties on long-term finance
For mandate see FCCC/CP/2012/L.15,
paragraph 5
ADP
Implementation of all the elements of decision 1/CP.17, (a) Matters related to paragraphs 2
to 6 Workstream 1
Information, views and proposals on matters related to the work of the ADP, including,
inter alia, mitigation, adaptation, finance, technology development and transfer,
capacity-building, and transparency of action and support, addressing aspects such as those
indicated in paragraph 29 (a–d) of document FCCC/ADP/2012/3.
(FCCC/ADP/2012/3,
paragraph 29)
Deadline: 1 March 2013
Submissions from non-admitted organizations
- Human Rights & Climate Change Working Group, Foundation for GAIA, and Planetary
Association for Clean Energy (see Centre for International Environmental Law, Earthjustice,
Interamerican Association for Environmental Defense and World Council of Churches link
above)
Implementation of all the elements of decision 1/CP.17, (b) Matters related to
paragraphs 7 and 8 Workstream 2
Information, views and proposals on actions, initiatives and options to enhance ambition,
including through the workplan on enhancing mitigation ambition, with a particular focus on
2013, including aspects indicated in paragraph 31 (a–c) of document
FCCC/ADP/2012/3.
(FCCC/ADP/2012/3,
paragraph 31)
Deadine: 1 March 2013
Submissions from non-admitted organizations
Views and recommendations from Parties on elements to be taken into account in the
fifth review of the financial mechanism, for consideration by the Standing Committee on
Finance, in the context of decision 8/cp.18
For mandate see Decision 8/CP.18, paragraph 4
Further views from Parties and admitted observer organizations on how the joint
implementation guidelines and other decisions of the CMP pertaining to joint implementation
should be revised.
For mandate see Decision 6/CMP.8, paragraph 12
Guidelines for the formulation of national adaptation plans (SBI)
Information from Parties and relevant organizations on their experiences with the
application of guidelines for the national adaptation plan process for least developed
countries.
For mandate see Decision 5/CP.17, paragraph 7
|
|
2012
For submissions received regarding long-term finance, please follow the
link below.
http://unfccc.int/cooperation_support/financial_mechanism/long-term_finance/items/6972.php
Additional inputs provided by observers in response to the invitation by
the ADP Co-Chairs (24 September)
Views on Cooperative sectoral approaches and sector-specific actions, in order to
enhance the implementation of Article 4, paragraph 1(c), of the Convention
(AWG-LCA).
For mandate see FCCC/AWGLCA/2008/3
paragraph 23 and FCCC/AWGLCA/2008/8,
paragraph 27
Initial review of the Adaptation Fund under the Kyoto Protocol (SBI). Further views
from Parties and relevant organizations on the review of the Adaptation Fund in accordance
with the annex to decision 6/CMP.6 and decision 1/CMP.3, paragraph 8.
For mandate see FCCC/SBI/2012/15
Views and information from Parties and relevant organizations and other
stakeholders, taking into account the outcomes of the implementation of the work programme
on loss and damage prior to the submission, on the possible elements to be included in the
recommendations on loss and damage in accordance with decision 1/CP.16
Submissions by non-admitted organizations
- Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (IDMC) (see above link to United Nations High
Commissioner for Refugees, United Nations University, the Norwegian Refugee Council, the
Special Rapporteur on the Human Rights of Internally Displaced Persons and the
International Organization for Migration) (submitted 19 October 2012)
- International Centre for Climate Change and Development (ICCCAD) (see Bangladesh Centre
for Advanced Studies link above) (submitted 17 September 2012)
For mandate see Decision 7/CP.17, paragraph 9
Views from Parties and relevant organizations on potential future areas of work of
the Nairobi work programme (Decision 6/CP.17, paragraph 2)
Submissions by non-admitted organizations
For mandate see FCCC/CP/2011/9/Add.2
Views on issues related to a more comprehensive accounting of anthropogenic
emissions by sources and removals by sinks from LULUCF, including through a more inclusive
activity-based approach or a land-based approach, as referred to in decision 2/CMP.7,
paragraph 5
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2012/2,
paragraph 118
Views on issues related to modalities and procedures for alternative approaches to
addressing the risk of non-permanence under the clean development mechanism (CDM), in
accordance with decision 2/CMP.7, paragraph 7
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2012/2,
paragraph 116
Views on issues related to modalities and procedures for possible additional LULUCF
activities under the CDM in accordance with decision 2/CMP.7, paragraph 6
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2012/2,
paragraph 117
Views on the issue of
A) The eligibility of carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) project activities which
involve the transport of carbon dioxide from one country to another or which involve
geological storage sites that are located in more than one country;
(b) The establishment of a global reserve of certified emission reduction (CER) units for
CCS project activities, in addition to the reserve referred to in decision 10/CMP.7,
annex, paragraph 21(b).
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2012/L.8,
Paragraph 3
Additional inputs provided by observers in response to the invitation by the
ADP Co-Chairs (25 June).
Submissions from non-admitted organizations
- Earth in Brackets, Friends of the Earth US, Instituto del Tercer mundo (ITeM), Nord-Sux
XXI, International Lawyers.org (see Third World Network and International Forum on
Globalization link above)
- Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (see Norwegian Refugee Council link above)
Guidance on the implementation of Article 6 of the Kyoto Protocol: Revision of the
joint implementation guidelines, taking into account the experience of implementing the
mechanisms under the Kyoto Protocol, including national guidelines, and the recommendations
on the first review of the joint implementation guidelines in accordance with decision
9/CMP.1, paragraph 8 (CMP).
For mandate see FCCC/KP/CMP/2011/L.7,
paragraph 14
Update on developments in research activities relevant to the needs of the
Convention, including on the long-term global goal; and information on technical and
scientific aspects of emissions and removals of all greenhouse gases from coastal and
marine ecosystems.
Submission by non-admitted organization
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2011/5,
paragraphs 40 and 43
Views on the work plan of the Ad Hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform for
Enhanced Action, including, inter alia, on mitigation, adaptation, finance, technology
development and transfer, transparency of action and support, and capacity
building.
For mandate see FCCC/CP/2011/L.10,
paragraph 5
Views on the work of the consultative Group of Experts on national communications
from Parties not included in Annex I to the Convention.
For mandate see FCCC/SBI/2011/L.31/Add.1,
paragraph 2
Views on possible elements of a successor work programme on Article 6 of the
Convention.
For mandate see FCCC/SBI/2011/L.6,
paragraph 2
Information and views that may be relevant to the completion of the review of the
amended New Delhi work programme on Article 6 of the Convention.
For mandate see FCCC/SBI/2011/L.6,
paragraph 2
Enhanced action on mitigation, Policy approaches and positive incentives on issues
relating to reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing
countries; and the role of conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement
of forest carbon stocks in developing countries (AWG-LCA).
-
Amazon
Environmental Research Institute, Conservation International, Environmental Defense Fund,
Natural Resources Defense Council, Rainforest Alliance, The Nature Conservancy, Union of
Concerned Scientists, Wildlife Conservation Society, Woods Hole Research Center, World
Vision International (submitted 9 March 2012)
-
Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) (submitted 5 March 2012)
-
Women's Environment & Development Organization (WEDO) (submitted 6 March
2012)
-
Carbon
Markets & Investors Association (CMIA) (submitted 5 March 2012)
-
ClientEarth, FERN, Forest Peoples' Programme, Friends of the Earth, Global Witness,
Rainforest Foundation Norway, Rainforest Foundation UK, Third World Network and
non-admitted organizations (see below) (submitted 5 March 2012)
-
Global
Forest Coalition (GFC) (submitted 2 March 2012)
-
International Emissions Trading Association (IETA) (submitted 5 March 2012)
-
Sustainable Population Australia (SPA) (submitted 5 March 2012)
-
WWF
(submitted 5 March 2012)
Submissions by non-admitted organizations
- Climate Justice Programme, International-Lawyers.org, Nord-Sud XXI (see ClientEarth
link above)
For mandate see
Views on issues relating to agriculture under the Subsidiary Body for Scientific
and Technological Advice.
Submissions by non-admitted organizations
For mandate see Decision [-/CP.17], (398 kB) paragraph 75
Enhanced action on mitigation. Various approaches. Views on the new market-based
mechanism.
Submissions from non-admitted organizations
- CDM Watch (see German NGO Forum link above)
For mandate see Decision [-/CP.17], (398 kB) paragraph 85
Enhanced action on mitigation. Various approaches. Views on a framework for various
approaches.
Submissions from non-admitted organizations
- CDM Watch (see German NGO Forum link above)
For mandate see Decision [-/CP.17] (398 kB) , paragraph 81
Views on the eligibility of carbon dioxide capture and storage project activities
involving transport of carbon dioxide from one country to another or which involve
geological storage sites that are located in more than one country; and on the
establishment of a global reserve of certified emission reduction units for carbon dioxide
capture and storage project activities.
For mandate see FCCC/KP/CMP/2011/L.4, paragraph 6
Views on issues identified in decision 1/CP.16, para. 72 and appendix II.
-
Agronomes et Vétérinaires Sans Frontiéres (AVSF), Groupe Energies
Renouvelables, Environnement et Solidarités (GERES), Groupe de recherche et
d'echanges technologiques (GRET), Planéte Urgence and non-admitted
organizations (see below) (submitted 27 April 2012)
-
Asia
Indigenous Peoples Pact (AIPP), International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs
(IWGIA) (submitted 18 April 2012)
-
Amazon
Environmental Research Institute (IPAM) (submitted 29 February 2012)
-
Conservation International (CI), Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), National Wildlife
Federation (NWF), The Nature Conservancy (TNC), Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS),
World Vision International (WVI) and a non-admitted organization (see below)
-
Global
Forest Coalition (GFC) (submitted 28 February 2012)
-
Global
Witness (submitted 29 February 2012)
-
Sustainable Population Australia Inc. (submitted 29 February 2012)
-
Wetlands
International (submitted 28 February 2012)
-
WWF
(submitted 28 February 2012)
-
Conservation International (CI), Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), Rainforest Alliance
(RA), The Nature Conservancy (TNC), Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), Woods Hole
Research Center (WHRC) (submitted 22 February 2012)
-
Climate
Action Network International (CAN International) (submitted 19 February 2012)
Submissions from non-admitted organizations
- Centres d'Actions et de Réalisations Internationales (CARI) and Coordination
SUD Alliance (see AVSF link above)
- Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (see Conservation International link above)
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2011/L.25,
paragraph 5
Views by Parties and observer organizations on options and ways for further
increasing the level of ambition.
Submissions from non-admitted organizations
-
Sandbag (submitted 28 February 2012)
For mandate see FCCC/CP/2011/L.10,
paragraph 8
|
2011
|
|
FOR SUBMISSIONS BY PARTIES PLEASE FOLLOW THIS LINK.
http://unfccc.int/documentation/submissions_from_parties_in_2011/items/5900.php
Further views on the elements for the development of a work programme and a possible forum
on response measures.
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2011/2,
paragraph 60 and FCCC/SBI/2011/7,
paragraph 128
Submissions to the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the
Convention: Ideas and proposals on the elements of paragraph 1 of the Bali Action Plan.
For mandate see FCCC/AWGLCA/2008/3,
paragraph 23 and FCCC/AWGLCA/2008/8,
paragraph 27
Nairobi work programme on impacts, vulnerability and adaptation to climate change.
Proposals for upcoming activities under the Nairobi work programme, taking into consideration the
information included in the annex to document FCCC/SBSTA/2011/L.13.
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2011/L.13
Views from relevant organizations on the following matters:
(a) The process to enable least developed country Parties to formulate and implement national
adaptation plans, building upon their experience in preparing and implementing NAPAs;
(b) The modalities and guidelines for least developed country Parties and other developing country
Parties to employ the modalities formulated to support national adaptation plans.
For mandate see FCCC/SBI/2011/L.16,
paragraph 7
Approaches to address loss and damage associated with climate change impacts in developing
countries that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change to enhance
adaptive capacity.
For mandate see FCCC/SBI/2011/7
Views on a range of methodological issues for activities relating to REDD-plus.
-
Environmental
Investigation Agency, Global Witness Limited, Humane Society International, Rainforest Foundation
UK, Wetlands International and a non-admitted organization (see below) (submitted 21
September 2011)
-
Women's
Environment & Development Organization (WEDO) (submitted 20 September 2011)
-
Center for
International Environmental Law (CIEL) (submitted 19 September 2011)
-
ClientEarth and
World Resources Institute (WRI) (submitted 19 September 2011)
-
MRV - Global
Witness Limited, Care International, ClientEarth, Environmental Defense Fund, Environmental
Investigation Agency (EIA), Forest Peoples' Programme (FPP), Greenpeace International,
Humane Society International, Rainforest Foundation Norway, Rainforest Foundation UK, Tebtebba
Foundation, Wetlands International and non-admitted organizations (see below) (submitted 19
September 2011)
-
Safeguards -
Global Witness Limited, Care International, Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL),
Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA), Forest Peoples' Programme (FPP), Greenpeace
International, Humane Society International, Rainforest Foundation Norway, Rainforest Foundation
UK, Tebtebba Foundation, Wetlands International and non-admitted organizations (see below)
(submitted 19 September)
-
Reference Levels
- Global Witness Limited, Wetlands International, Humane Society International, Environmental
Investigation Agency, The Rainforest Foundation, and a non- admitted organization (see below)
(submitted 19 September 2011)
-
Tropical Forest
Group (TFG) (submitted 20 September 2011)
-
WWF
(submitted 19 September 2011)
-
Care
International on behalf of Accra Caucus (submitted 16 September 2011)
-
Forest
Peoples' Programme (FPP) (submitted 16 September 2011)
-
Greenpeace
International (submitted 19 September 2011)
-
Wetlands
International (submitted 16 September 2011)
-
Climate Action
Network International (CAN International) (submitted 16 September 2011)
-
The Nature
Conservancy (TNC) (submitted 15 September 2011)
-
Amazon
Environmental Research Institute (IPAM), Conservation International (CI), Environmental Defense
Fund (EDF), Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), Rainforest Alliance (RA), The Nature
Conservancy (TNC), Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS),
Woods Hole Research Center (WHRC), World Vision International (WVI) (submitted 6 September
2011)
-
Union of
Concerned Scientists (UCS) (submitted 29 April 2011)
Submissions from non-admitted organizations
- David Shepherd Wildlife Foundation (see Environmental Investigation Agency link above)
-
Consultative
Group for International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) (submitted 19 September)
- MRV and Safeguards - Les Amis de la Nature et des Jardins (ANJ), Centre d'Accompagnement
des Autochtones Pygmées et Minoritaires Vulnérables (CAMV), Centro de
Planifación y Estudios Sociales (CEPLAES), Council for Environmental Defense by Legality and
Traceability (CODELT), Ecoforestry Forum Inc., Environnement, Resources Naturelles et
Développement (ERND Institute), Federation of Community Forestry Users (FECOFUN), Forum pour
la Gouvernance et les Droits de l'Homme (FGDH), Friends of the Earth, Switzerland - Pro Natura,
Groupe de Travail Climat REDD (GTCR), Perkumpulan HuMa, Réseau des communicateurs de
l'environnement (RCEN), Union Pour l'Emancipation de la Femme Autochtones (UEFA),
Australian Climate Justice Programme, David Shepherd Wildlife Foundation, Society for New
Initiatives and Activities (SONIA) (see Global Witness Limited links above)
- Reference Levels - David Shepherd Wildlife Foundation (see Global Witness Limited link above)
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2011/2,
paragraph 31
Update on developments in research activities relevant to the needs of the
Convention.
Submissions from non-admitted observer organizations
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2010/6,
paragraph 47
Implications of the inclusion of reforestation of lands with forest in exhaustion as
afforestation and reforestation clean development mechanism project activities.
Submissions from non-admitted observer organizations
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2010/L.15,
paragraph 1
Views on appeals against CDM Executive Board decisions.
Submissions from non-admitted observer organizations
- CDM Watch (see ClientEarth link above)
For mandate see FCCC/CMP/2010/L.8, paragraph 18 and 19
Views on the issue of materiality under the clean development mechanism.
Submissions from non-admitted observer organizations
For mandate see FCCC/KP/CMP/2010/12/Add.2
- Decision 3/CMP.6, paragraphs 30 and 31
Views on carbon dioxide capture and storage in geological formations as clean development
mechanism project activities.
Submissions from non-admitted observer organizations
For mandate see FCCC/KP/CMP/2010/12/Add.2,
Decision 7/CMP.6, paragraph 4
Information and views relating to modalities for the operationalization of the work
programme and a possible forum on response measures.
Submission from non-admitted observer organization
For mandate see FCCC/AWGLCA/2010/L.7,
paragraphs 93-94
Further views and relevant information on progress made and gaps as well as views on new
activities that may be needed to achieve the objective and expected outcomes of the Nairobi work
programme.
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2010/L.20,
paragraph 5
Views on the items relating to a work programme for the development of modalities and
guidelines listed in Decision 1/CP.16, paragraph 46.
For mandate see FCCC/CP/2010/7/Add.1,
paragraphs 46 and 47, Decision 1/CP.16
Views and information on elements to be included in the work programme on loss and
damage.
Submissions from non-admitted organizations
For mandate see FCCC/AWGLCA/2010/L.7
Views on the composition of, and modalities and procedures for, the Adaptation Committee,
including linkages with other relevant institutional arrangements.
For mandate see FCCC/AWGLCA/2011/MISC.1
Information and views on issues that could be addressed at the joint workshop on matters
relating to Article 2, paragraph 3, and Article 3, paragraph 14, of the Kyoto Protocol.
For mandate see FCCC/SB/2011/MISC.1
Views on the elaboration of market-based and non-market-based mechanisms and the evaluation
of various approaches in enhancing the cost-effectiveness of, and promoting, mitigation
actions
-
Amazon
Environmental Research Institute (IPAM) (submitted 22 February 2011)
-
BusinessEurope (submitted 22 February 2011)
-
Carbon Markets
and Investors Association (CMIA) (submitted 22 February 2011)
-
Civic
Exchange (submitted 22 February 2011)
- Climate Action Network International (CAN International) (submitted 22 February 2011)
-
The Corner
House (submitted 22 February 2011)
-
Environmental
Defense Fund (EDF), Amazon Environmental Research Institute (IPAM), Conservation International
(CI), Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), The Nature Conservancy, Rainforest Alliance,
Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) and World Vision
International (WVI) (submitted 22 February 2011)
-
Environmental
Investigation Agency (EIA) (submitted 22 February 2011)
-
European
Chemical Industry Association (CEFIC) on behalf of the European Fluorocarbons Technical Committee
and members of the Global Fluorocarbon Producers Forum which include non-admitted observer
organizations (submitted 22 February 2011)
-
Federation of
Electric Power Companies of Japan (FEPC) (submitted 22 February 2011)
-
FERN and Friends
of the Earth USA (part of Friends of the Earth International) (submitted 22 February 2011)
-
Focus on the
Global South, The Corner House, ECONEXUS, Fairwatch Association, Gender CC-Women for Climate
Justice and various non-admitted organizations (see below) (submitted 22 February 2011)
-
Fondazione
Lombardia per l'Ambiente (FLA) (submitted 22 February 2011)
-
Friends of the
Earth International (FOEI) (submitted 22 February 2011)
-
Global Forest
Coalition (GFC) (submitted 22 February 2011)
-
Institute for
Agriculture and Trade Policy (IATP) (submitted 22 February 2011)
-
Institute for
Global Environmental Strategies (IGES) (submitted 22 February 2011)
-
International
Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD) (submitted 22 February 2011)
-
International
Chamber of Commerce (ICC) (submitted 22 February 2011)
-
International
Emissions Trading Association (IETA) (submitted 22 February 2011)
-
Natural
Resources Defense Council (NRDC), Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) and Union of Concerned
Scientists (UCS) (submitted 22 February 2011)
-
Network of
Regional Governments for Sustainable Development (nrg4SD) (submitted 22 February 2011)
-
Swedish Society
for Nature Conservation (SSNC) (submitted 22 February 2011)
-
Tebtebba
Foundation (submitted 22 February 2011)
-
Tropical Forest
Group (TFG) (submitted 22 February 2011)
-
World Business
Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) (submitted 22 February 2011)
Submissions from non-admitted organizations
For mandate see FCCC/AWGLCA/2011/MISC.5
|
|
2010
Information and views that may be relevant to the completion of the intermediate review of
the amended New Delhi work programme, including information on best practices and lessons learned
from its implementation and on remaining barriers to the effective implementation of Article 6 of
the Convention
For mandate see FCCC/SBI/2010/10,
paragraph 67
Arrangements for Intergovernmental Meetings - Ways to enhance the engagement of observer
organizations
-
Business Council
for Sustainable Energy (BCSE), Carbon Markets & Investors Association (CMIA), Global Wind
Energy Council (GWEC), International Council for Sustainable Energy (ICSE), International
Emissions Trading Association (IETA) (submitted 01 September 2010)
-
Climate Action
Network International (CAN) (submitted 15 August 2010)
-
Federation of
Electric Power Companies of Japan (FEPC) (submitted 12 August 2010)
-
Friends of the
Earth International (FOEI) (submitted 18 August 2010)
-
GenderCC-Women
for Climate Justice (GenderCC) on behalf of Life e.V., Women in Europe for a Common Future
(WECF), Women's Environment and Development Organisation (WEDO) ( submitted 09 September
2010)
-
Global Witness
on behalf of the Ecosystems Climate Alliance (submitted 16 August 2010)
-
Global
Legislators Organisations for a Balanced Environment (Globe EU) (submitted 27 August 2010)
-
ICLEI - Local
Governments for Sustainability (ICLEI) (submitted 17 August 2010)
-
International
Chamber of Commerce (ICC) (submitted 16 August 2010)
-
Clean Energy
Nepal (CEN), Energy Crossroads (EC), European Youth Forum (YFJ), Federation of Young European
Greens (FYEG), International Federation of Liberal Youth (IFLRY), International Federation of
Medical Students Association (IFMSA), International Forestry Student Association (IFSA), Jeunes
Volontaires pour l'Environnement (JVE), Service Civil International (SCI), SustainUS, UK
Youth Climate Coalition (UKYCC), World Association of Girl Guides and Girl Scouts (WAGGGS)
(submitted 20 August 2010)
-
Joint submission
by Climate Action Network-International Secretariat (ENGO Focal Point), International Federation
of Agricultural Producers (Farmers* Focal Point), ICLEI-Local Governments for Sustainability
(LGMA Focal Point), GenderCC (Women and Gender* Focal Point), Service Civil International
(YOUNGO* Focal Point) (submitted 31 August 2010)
-
Keidanren
(submitted 16 August 2010)
-
World Business
Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) (submitted 16 August 2010)
-
WWF
International (WWF) (submitted 16 August 2010)
* Based on their request, the above groups are recognized as constituencies on a provisional
basis pending a final decision of their status before COP 17/CMP 7.
For mandate see FCCCC/SBI/2010/10,
paragraph 167
Standardized baselines under the clean development mechanism
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2010/6,
paragraph 94
Views and information on the effectiveness of the Nairobi work programme on impacts,
vulnerability and adaptation to climate change in fulfilling its objective, expected outcome, scope
of work and modalities
Other submissions from non-admitted organizations
|
|
|
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2010/6, paragraph 20
|
|
Modalities and procedures for the development of standardized baselines
|
|
For mandate see FCCC/KP/CMP/2009/L.10
|
|
Adaptation Fund under the Kyoto Protocol
|
|
For mandate see FCCC/SBI/2009/8,
paragraph 37
|
|
2008-2009
|
|
Possible further actions on the implementation of Article 4, paragraph 8, of the Convention
and decisoins 5/CP.7 and 1/CP.10
For mandate see FCCC/SBI/2009/8,
paragraph 45
|
|
Nairobi work programme on impacts, vulnerability and adaptation to climate change
submissions under the area of adaptation planning and practices
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2008/6,
paragraph 63
|
|
Nairobi work programme on impacts, vulnerability and adaptation to climate change
submissions under the area of socio-economic information
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2008/6,
paragraph 51
|
|
Views on possible improvements to emissions trading and the project-based
mechanisms.
For mandate see FCCC/KP/AWG/2009/L.2,
paragraph 2
|
|
Further views on information on potential environmental, economic and social consequences,
including spillover effects, of tools, policies, measures and methodologies available to Annex I
Parties.
For mandate see FCCC/KP/AWG/2009/L4,
paragraph 4
|
|
Ideas and proposals on the elements of paragraph 1 of the Bali Action Plan.
*Not an admitted observer organization
For mandate see FCCC/AWGLCA/2008/8,
paragraph 25 and FCCC/AWGLCA/2008/L.10,
paragraph 2(a)
Other submissions from non-admitted organizations
For mandate see FCCC/AWGLCA/2008/17,
paragraph 26 (b)
|
|
Views and proposals for further elaboration of the options, elements and issues contained
in the annex "Options and proposals on how to address definitions, modalities, rules and
guidelines for the treatment of land use, land-use change and forestry" (LULUCF).
For mandate see FCCC/KP/AWG/2009/L.3,
paragraph 3
|
|
Views on the areas of focus set out in section IV of the terms of reference for the review
and assessment of the effectiveness of the implementation of Article 4, paragraphs 1(c) and 5, of
the convention agreed at the twenty-ninth session of the Subsidiary Body of
Implementation.
For mandate see FCCC/SBI/2008/L.28
For submissions by Parties, please see FCCC/SBI/2009/MISC.4
|
|
Views on issues relating to indigenous people and local communities for the development and
application of methodologies.
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2008/13
(paragraph 45)
Other submission
For submissions by Parties, please see FCCC/SBSTA/2009/MISC.1
|
|
Experiences and views, including country-specific information where possible, on needs for
technical and institutional capacity-building and cooperation in, inter alia, the implementation of
methodologies for estimating and monitoring changes in forest cover and associated carbon stocks
and GHG emissions, incremental changes due to sustainable management of forests, reduction of
emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, national and subnational monitoring and
reporting systems, and methodologies for forest inventories, ground-based and remote-sensing
approaches
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2008/13
(paragraph 44)
For submissions by Parties, please see FCCC/SBSTA/2009/MISC.2
|
|
Further elaboration of the options, elements and issues contained in annex III to the
report of the first part of the sixth session, and annex IV to the report at the resumed fifth
session, including views on how and which proposals could address cross-cutting issues
(LULUCF)
For mandate see FCCC/KP/AWG/2008/L.19,
paragraph 8 (b)
|
|
Further input in relation to possible improvements to emissions trading and the
project-based mechanisms under the Kyoto Protocol
For mandate see FCCC/KP/AWG/2008/5
and annexes I and II to document FCCC/KP/AWG/2008/INF.3
Other submission
|
|
Further input in relation to possible improvements to emissions trading and the
project-based mechanisms under the Kyoto Protocol
For mandate see FCCC/KP/AWG/2008/5,
paragraph 22
|
|
Carbon dioxide capture and storage in geological formations as clean development mechanism
project activities
For mandate see FCCC/KP/CMP/2006/10/Add.1,
decision 1/CMP.2, paragraph 21 and FCCC/SBSTA/2007/L.19
Other submission
|
|
Information, views and proposals on paragraph 1 of the Bali Action Plan
For mandate see FCCC/CP/2007/6/Add.1,,
decision 1/CP.13 and FCCC/AWGLCA/2008/3,
paragraph 23
-
Global Witness Limited and The Wilderness Society (corrigendum 19 December
2008)
-
Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (OIES) (submitted 17 December 2008)
-
ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability (ICLEI) (submitted 9 December
2008)
-
Rainforest Foundation UK (RFUK) on behalf of 26 organizations and networks
(submitted 7 December 2008)
-
WWF (submitted 6 December 2008)
-
Third World Network (TWN) (submitted 6 December 2008)
-
The Wilderness Society (submitted 6 December 2008)
-
The Nature Conservancy (TNC) (submitted 6 December 2008)
-
Network of Regional Governments for Sustainable Developments (NRG4SD) (submitted 6
December 2008)
-
Life e.V. (submitted 6 December 2008)
-
International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) (submitted 6 December
2008)
-
International Federation of Agricultural Producers (IFAP) (submitted 6 December
2008)
-
Heinrich Böll and Christian Aid (submitted 6 December 2008)
-
Greenpeace International (submitted 6 December 2008)
-
Global Witness Limited (submitted 6 December 2008)
-
Germanwatch, Bread for the World and CARE International (submitted 6 December
2008)
-
Friends of the Earth International (FOEI) (submitted 6 December 2008)
-
FERN, Friends of the Earth International (FOEI), and Rainforest Foundation UK (RFUK)
(submitted 6 December 2008)
-
Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA), Third Generation Environmentalism (E3G),
Tearfund and WWF (submitted 6 December 2008)
-
Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA) (submitted 6 December 2008)
-
Climatenet (submitted 6 December 2008)
-
Climate Action Network International (CAN International) (submitted 6 December
2008)
-
Amazon Institute for Environmental Research (IPAM), Conservation International (CI).
Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), National Wildlife Federation (NWF), Natural Resources Defense
Council (NRDC), The Nature Conservancy (TNC), Tropical Forest Group (TFG), Union of Concerned
Scientists (UCS), World Wildlife Fund (WWF) (submitted 6 December 2008)
-
Women’s
Environment and Development Organization (WEDO) (submitted 5 December 2008)
-
Keidanren
(submitted 26 November 2008)
-
Wetlands
International (submitted 20 November 2008)
-
Humane Society
International (HSI) (submitted 20 November 2008)
-
International
Chamber of Commerce (ICC) (submitted 14 November 2008)
-
International Trade
Union Confederation (ITUC) (submitted 06 October 2008)
-
International
Emissions Trading Association (IETA) (submitted 01 October
2008)
-
Woods Hole Research
Center (WHRC) and Amazon Institut for Environmental Research (IPAM) (submitted 30 September
2008)
-
Third World Network
on shared vision (TWN) (submitted 30 September 2008)
-
Third World Network
on multilateral financial structure (TWN) (submitted 30 September 2008)
-
Third World Network
on technology and Intellectual Property Rights (TWN) (submitted 30 September 2008)
-
Third World Network
on technology transfer (TWN) (submitted 30 September 2008)
-
Third World Network
on sectoral approaches (TWN) (submitted 30 September 2008)
-
Oxfram
International (submitted 30 September 2008)
-
Munich Climate Insurance Initiative (MCII) (submitted 30 September and updated 6
December 2008)
-
Norwegian Forum for
Environment and Development (ForUM) (submitted 30 September 2008)
-
Centre for
Socio-Economic Development (CSEND) (submitted 30 September 2008)
-
Climate Action
Network International on shared vision (CAN) (submitted 30 September 2008)
-
Climate Action
Network International on REDD (CAN) (submitted 30 September 2008)
-
Climate Action
Network International on mitigation (CAN) (submitted 30 September 2008)
-
Climate Action
Network International on adaptation (CAN) (submitted 30 September 2008)
-
Climate Action
Network International (CAN)
-
Global Legislators
for a Balanced Environment (GLOBE)
-
International Trade
Union Confederation (ITUC)
-
Wetlands
International
-
Humane Society
International (Reduced emissions from REDD)
-
Tearfund (Disaster
risk reduction in adaptation)
The latest submissions by Parties are currently available here. All submission by intergovernmental
organizations, including those received after the issuance of this document, are currently
available here.
|
|
Reducing emissions from deforestation in developing countries: approaches to stimulate
action
For mandate see FCCC/CP/2007/6/Add.1,
decision 2/CP.13, paragraph 7 (a)
Other submission
For submissions by Parties, please see FCCC/SBSTA/2008/MISC.4
|
|
Nairobi work programme on impacts, vulnerability, and adaptation to climate change
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2006/11,
paragraph 21
|
|
Consideration of relevant methodological issues
For mandate see FCCC/KP/AWG/2007/5,
paragraph 19 (d) (iii)
|
|
Preparations for the second review of the Kyoto Protocol pursuant to its Article 9
For mandate see FCCC/KP/CMP/2007/9/Add.1,
decision 4/CMP.3, paragraph 6
For submissions by Parties, please see FCCC/SBI/2008/MISC.2
|
|
Development and transfer of technologies under the SBI
For mandate see FCCC/CP/2007/L.2,
paragraph 7
|
|
Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2007/16,
parargraph 51
For submissions by Parties, please see FCCC/SBSTA/2008/MISC.2
|
|
Means to achieve mitigation objectives of Annex I Parties
For mandate see FCCC/KP/AWG/2007/2,
paragraph 24
For submissions by Parties, please see FCCC/KP/AWG/2008/MISC.1
|
|
2007
|
|
A. Views on the development of a timetable to guide the completion of the work of the AWG to
be compiled by the secretariat for consideration by the AWG at its resumed fourth session
For mandate see FCCC/KP/AWG/2007/4
(paragraph 25)
|
|
B. Nairobi work programme on impacts, vulnerability and adaptation to climate change.
Information and views on matters relating to the availability of information on the socio-economic
aspect of climate change and improving the integration of socio-economic information into impact
and vulnerability assessments, including information on the development of socio-economic scenarios
and for understanding adaptive capacity
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2006/11
(paragraph 51)
|
|
C. Further guidance relating to the CDM. Views on carbon dioxide capture and storage in
geological formations as CDM project activities
For mandate see FCCC/KP/CMP/2006/10/Add.1
decision 1/CMP.2 (paragraphs 21 and 22)
|
|
D. Views on the implications of possible changes to the limit established for small-scale
afforestation and reforestation clean development mechanism project activities under decision
6/CMP.1
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2007/4
(paragraphs 78 and 79)
|
|
E. Comments on the scope and content on the second review under Article 9 of the Kyoto
Protocol and the preparations required for conducting the review
For mandate see FCCC/KP/CMP/2006/10/Add.1
|
|
F. Submissions on adaptation approaches, strategies, practices and technologies for
adaptation at the regional, national and local levels in different sectors, as well as on
experiences, needs and concerns
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2006/11
(paragraph 56)
|
|
G. Information on existing and emerging assesment methodologies and tools; and views on
lessons learned from their application; opportunities, gaps, needs, constraints and barriers;
possible ways to develop and better disseminate methods and tools; and training
opportunities
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2006/11
(paragraph 3)
|
|
H. Mitigation potential of policies and measures
For mandate see FCCC/KP/AWG/2007/L.2
(paragraph 8)
Additional information provided by CAN International
|
|
I. Views on carbon dioxide capture and storage as clean development mechanism project
activities
For mandate see Decision 1/CMP.2 (paragraph 21)
Admitted non-governmental organizations
Submissions from organizations which are not admitted may be viewed here.
|
|
J. Reducing emissions from deforestation in developing countries
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2007/4
(paragraph 39)
|
|
K. Reducing emissions from deforestation in developing countries
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2006/11
(paragraph 89)
Submissions from Parties and admitted IGOs, contained in miscellaneous documents
FCCC/SBSTA/2007/MISC.2 and FCCC/SBSTA/2007/MISC.3 respectively, may be viewed here.
|
|
L. Information about external bodies and forums that could provide expert input to the work
of the AWG
For mandate see FCCC/KP/AWG/2006/4
(paragraph 20)
|
|
M. Views on the implications of possibly changing the limit established for small-scale
afforestation and reforestation CDM project activities
For mandate see
Decision 1/CMP.2 (paragraph 27)
|
|
2006
|
|
A. Article 9 of the Kyoto Protocol
For mandate see FCCC/KP/CMP/2005/8
(paragraph 77)
|
|
B. Implications of the situation where the issuing of certified emission reductions (CERs)
for the destruction of hydrofluorocarbon-23 (HFC-23) at new hydrochlorofluorocarbon-22 (HCFC-22)
facilities could lead to higher global production of HCFC-22 and/or HFC-23 than would otherwise
occur
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2006/5
(paragraph 100)
|
|
C. Initial views on the issues to be discussed at the Dialogue on long-term cooperative
action to address climate change by enhancing implementation of the Convention
For mandate see Decision 1/CP.11 (paragraph 8)
|
|
D. Reducing emissions from deforestation in developing countries
For mandate see
FCCC/CP/2005/5 (paragraph 81)
Submissions from Parties are contained in miscellaneous document
FCCC/SBSTA/2006/MISC.5.
|
|
E. Carbon dioxide capture and storage as clean development mechanism project
activities
For mandate see Decision 7/CMP.1 (paragraph 6)
|
|
2005
|
|
A. Implications of the establishment, under the clean
development mechanism, of new, hydrochlorofluorocarbon-22 (HCFC-22) facilities seeking to obtain
certified emissions reductions for the destruction of hydrofluorocarbon-23 (HFC-23)
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2005/L.3
(paragraph 2)
|
|
B. Effective participation of observers
For mandate see FCCC/SBI/2004/10
(paragraph 99)
|
|
|