Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain a description of the monitoring systems, quality assurance and/or quality control system employed by the project activity, data collection procedures (information flow including data generation, aggregation, recording, calculation and reporting), organizational structure, roles and responsibilities of personnel, emergency procedures for the monitoring system, and/or line diagrams showing all relevant monitoring points). as per PS version 09.0 paragraph 246.
Issue: The monitoring report does not include diagram of the monitoring system and the information flow as required in the section C of the Instructions for filling out the monitoring report form.

2: Scope: The verification and certification report does not provide a conclusion on the verified amount of emission reductions achieved nor/or confirm that appropriate methods and formulae for calculating baseline emissions, project emissions and leakage have been followed as per VVS version 09.0 paragraphs 403 (c) and 409 (j).
Issue: The DOE is required to provide further information on how it verified the calculation of the EGy (Net electricity exported to the grid by the project activity) as per the equations referred in the appendix 3 of the PDD (Ver: 6.0, Date: 24/09/2010) section “Apportioning Procedure Implemented by Enercon and Certified by MSEDCL” as (1) The spreadsheet “Emission Reductions” shows that the EGf2,y (column I) is calculated by aggregating the values directly from the spreadsheet “Generation Details” rows 8 to 22 which are the net electricity generated from those 15 WEGs belonging to the project activity, and (2) the values EGf2,JMR,export (spreadsheet “Emission Reductions” column E) and EGf2,JMR,import (spreadsheet “Emission Reductions” column H) are not utilized to calculate the EGf2,y as per the PDD apportioning procedure. The same issues above are also found for the calculation of the values of EGf3,y.